White Supremacy & the Far Right

The ultimate source of everything that makes us human is the spirit. The psycho-intellectual and physical / biological dimensions of a human being, and all of its sociopolitical peripherals, are reflections of the station and condition of the individual spirit / soul. 

One of the most monumental errors it is possible for a human to make is the belief that the aforementioned vector of manifestation of mind and body from spirit happens in reverse.

All political ideologies are the result of the ego attempting to recreate "external" reality in the form and image of the psychological anomalies that result from, and reflect, anomalies of the spirit. 

I have yet to meet an alt-right / white nationalist or secular leftist who possesses the conceptual framework or spiritual intelligence to understand this. 

The only possible exception I'm aware of is in the works of early 20th century Italian fascist philosopher Julius Evola. He believed in the spiritual / metaphysical inferiority of the Jewish and African races that existed in the spirit before it manifested in the mind and physical body. But this was the apogee of the ruinous nature of the far right. In other words, he did not diagnose the disease; he glorified it. He cultivated the cancer that has spread through the world. His work was as evil as it was brilliant and is being sustained and spread through the world as we speak.

Racism is a disease that extends to both the psychological and spiritual dimensions of a human being. It is based on a number of factors all racists have in common:

1. Fear of surface appearances that differ from their own, or do not conform to paradigms of human cultural or physical manifestations that do not resemble imagery in the mind (which, by the way, only exists in their mind, and has no correlation to anything in reality).

2. Fear of loss. Exposure to some anthropological "other" triggers a reaction wherein the "other / different" is associated with the threat of being forcibly or cunningly deprived of possessions, social status, or some personal sense of pride or honor. This is similar to that found in many species of animals. 

3. A lack of perspective and insight. This is either the conditioned behavior, or hard-wired incapacity to recognize similarities between people of different persuasions, and to understand on a deep and fundamental level that differences in humans / a multiplicity of manifestation, is essential to the structure of the existence of the universe. This is a subtle form of polytheism in its most degraded form. Polytheists look at unity and see multiplicity, whereas a true monotheist looks at multiplicity and see unity (lest you think otherwise, external appearances of polytheism or monotheism may harbor a very different internal motivation). 

I must point out that some people associate all this with a lack of intelligence, however, this is a mistake. While you will certainly find morons among their ranks, many racists are extraordinarily intelligent people. They are not stupid: they're insane. Such people are extraordinarily dangerous, because they usually have the capacity and the will to attempt to shape social order to conform to their insanity; and know how to incite other less intelligent people to do their dirty work for them.    

From a biological perspective, race is nothing more than set of genetic mutations that give human beings specific advantages and survival mechanisms in specific environments. 

The artificial intellectual abstraction that these traits determine intellectual, moral, spiritual, or any other superiority or inferiority contradicts reality. 

Anyone who attempts to construct a system of social order based on those erroneous ideas is dangerously insane. Dialogue with such people is futile.

White nationalists often compare themselves to the early Christians of Rome. The early Christians were mostly apolitical; a spiritual organization with absolutely no power at the time who'd entered politics after three centuries of bloody persecution. There were also several different groups whose beliefs differed regarding the nature of Jesus. Some were absolute monotheists who, like the Muslims who would follow them six centuries later, believed Jesus was a prophet. Some saw Jesus as an aspect of God. Others followed the trinitarian teachings of Paul of Tarsus; whose teachings would eventually dominate Christianity. The Roman emperor Constantine and the Nicean Council of 325 AD coopted their entire religion, mixed it with Roman paganism, and set up a hierarchal government based upon their construct. This caused Pauline Trinitarianism to become the dominant version of Christianity. 

White nationalists are a political organization with an extremist political ideology based entirely in an unrealistically myopic interpretation of ethnicity and geopolitics. They did not endure three centuries of bloody persecution, and were, in fact, the authors of persecution of other ethnicities. Their religion / spirituality is informed by a version of Christianity that was constructed to suit their politics. And this, after their religious base had been subject to two thousand years of revisions, and as a result, bears no actual resemblance to the authentic teachings of Jesus, the Son of Mary. 

To drive this point home, many white nationalists reject Christianity altogether in favor of Nordic / Teutonic neo-paganism. 

The comparison between modern white nationalists and the early Christians of Rome is ridiculous. The attempt is an act of desperation - or at least indicative of a deplorable lack of conceptual and linguistic sophistication (which the white nationalists have n abundance). While the capacity of white nationalists to create tyranny and destruction is not to be underestimated for a moment, their capacity to produce works of intellectual sublimity and depth of thought is negligible and barely existent.

White supremacists have many ideological failures. It’s also been my experience that they suffer from a deplorable ignorance of the roots of their own belief system.

The influence of Hindu beliefs, brought into German occult societies by people like Karl Haushoffer, hold a profound influence over what became the alt-right. This succeeded the older ideas of simple-minded people like Eugene Fischer, during the German occupation of Namiba; a failure for the Germans.

The German idea of race borrowed heavily from the Hindu caste system, without understanding it, nor how to apply these concepts to geopolitics. The four main castes in traditional Hinduism (Bhramin / priests and scholars, Kshatriyas / warriors and princes, Vaishyas / merchants, and Shudras / peasants) hold some validity in the general description and definition of human beings.

Their complaint (whether they can articulate it as such or not) is that the "castes" have become mixed, and their essence has “contaminated” each other: the Brahmin and Kshatriyas by the weakness and sentimentality of the lower castes, and the Vaishyas and Shudras by the attempt to ascend to stations they cannot understand. 

However, the alt-right and their predecessors err in the belief that these categories are definable only by ethnicity.

There is no actual fact, theory of fact, or extrapolation of fact that can prove their idea to be true. Every attempt on their part to apply their ideas to a localized or geopolitical structure of social order has created nothing but destruction, ruin, and failure. It is impossible for these ideas to succeed in the promise of the ennoblement and exaltation of the "white race" - which itself is idiotic, because the racial homogeneity they claim does not actually exist in the real universe.

Furthermore, they err in the misinterpretation of the philosophies of Julius Evola. Evola made a number of fatal mistakes; not the least of which was to alter his own philosophies to pander to the desires of the German national socialists and Italian fascists. This was his ruin. But the leadership of the alt-right not only fail to understand this, but they also take their own failures a step further into degeneracy. This, by the belief that the apocalyptic end of the Kali Yuga (Iron Age, a degenerate period in the cycle of human history just before the reemergence of a golden age) can be artificially accelerated. To add insult to injury, they place a Christian façade over this, using it as a moral justification for their agenda. Their effort at apocalyptical acceleration conveniently ignores Matthew 24:36.

Factions of the alt-right / white nationalists (for they are in no way an absolutely monolithic entire: there are different schools of thought among them) argue for the cultivation of "white" / Eurocentric culture, which they believe is threatened.

There are are problems with this.

The first is that they are vocal in their praise of Adolph Hitler. Their basic argument is that in resisting international banking, Hitler was able to provide a good and prosperous life for the German people. This, of course, conveniently ignores the fact that a great many people suffered needlessly so that this could be done. All tyrants provide a good life for a percentage of people; most of whom remain unaware of how their riches were acquired. And it was, in the end, a temporary success, because 1. Hitler's cult of personality was such that individual freedoms were being abolished at an astonishing rate ("National socialism is the determination to create a new man. There will no longer exist any individual arbitrary will, nor realms in which the individual belongs to himself. The time of happiness as a private matter is over." - Adolph Hitler 1941), 2. Nazi military expansion made sustaining German prosperity impossible (and Hitler made some very serious military errors).

The second is that it is actually unnecessary. European culture is firmly established in the world. It's future is secure, even with the introduction of Asian, African, and American cultural elements. 

Which brings me to the third point. There is no such thing as a monolithic European culture. Europe is an aggregate of a multitude of cultures and languages; and the so-called white people of the world are similar aggregate of multiple cultures and ethnicities. For example, my ethnicity is Italian, Russian, and Irish. I have no ethnic kinship with Germans, Swedes, French, etc. 

In fact, I do not believe in the existence of white, black, brown, red, or yellow people. Among these categories are so many ethnicities that share little or no real connection that the labels are meaningless. They are lazy broad strokes that sustain an artificial political construct. The only possible result is that the very problems that white nationalists are attempting to solve will only be exacerbated.

The whole concept of racial purity is a political fiction that exists nowhere in nature.

A white nationalist once asked me how it was possible that I got along with "black" people, who, in his estimation, hate all "white" people. The only real answer is my inner security in who and what I am. I experience no threat from anyone's ethnicity, and by default, pose no threat; and as a result, exposure to an "alien" culture or ethnicity only produces delight and mutual profit. 

“If one is secure at the foundation, he will not be pained by departure from minor details or affairs that are contrary to expectation” (Tsunetomo Yamamoto, author of the Hagakure: The Book of the Samurai). It is for this reasons that white nationalists are doomed to failure. Their "crusade" is built upon insecure foundations.

The ridiculous fact is that no white supremacist is secure as a “white” person.

================================

One’s religious beliefs are, of course, a matter of personal choice. If one wishes to be, say, Christian, I happily abide by the Qur'anic command "Laa iqaraha fii hii dinikuum" ("There must be no compulsion in religion. Qur'an 2:256). The matter is not for me to comment on, and I defer all judgment to Allah.

But I have come across a lot of people who attempt to apply race based nationalist ideals to the teachings of Jesus. This is, frankly, a horrendous mistake. They are incompatible with one another. I've read the entire Bible, and know it quite well; and while nationalism is theoretically an aspect of Judaism, I found nothing whatsoever in the Gospels (canonic or apocryphal) to support race based nationalism.

In fact, I invite whoever reads this to find a single verse in Mark, Matthew, Luke, or John wherein Jesus (peace be upon him) even describes race based nationalism, let alone encourages it. I promise you that you will fail.

If the teachings and revelations of Jesus overrule the Mosaic Law, as Christian doctrine insinuates (despite orthodox interpretations of Matthew 5:17 - a paradox if ever there was one), then nationalism is incompatible with Christian beliefs and spirituality. And if you have any questions about why Jesus rejected the politicizing of religion (and by religion, I mean a method to achieve enlightenment and nearness to, and alignment with, Divinity) a careful reading of the 23rd chapter of Matthew should clarify things.

It is obvious that nationalism partially ruined Islam for the Arabs. That and usury (but that's another discussion). The Prophet (sas) saw it coming centuries ago, and warned us every step of the way. And he was right.

===================

We must examine why National socialists believe that Hitler saved Germany.

A careful examination of the so -called “economic miracle” of the National Socialist Party reveals it to be nothing more than a Ponzi scheme where he robbed the workers in order to build up the military and police state. 

One example is Volkswagen. He promised that there would be a car for any German Worker who wanted one. They were to sign up, and then some money would be deducted from their pay until such time as the car would be paid for, and then thy were to receive one. However, not a single VW rolled off the production line until after WWII.  The money was diverted to military build up. 

Kraft Durch Freude was a scam cooked up by Robert Ley. It promised cheap vacations for German workers. They got the vacations, but not ones worth paying for!. 

German workers were held by a system known as the Arbeitsbuch, which would be held by the employer. It was a permit to work, and assured the employer that the person was not Jewish or part of another “inferior” race. The worker had employment security if they worked, but did not have the right to quit and go elsewhere without their employer’s permission. This is, by definition, indentured servitude.

Concentration camps and slave labour were used by the nazis from the beginning. 

The Nazis burned books and destroyed priceless art that Hitler did not like. 

They would punish you for listening to music they did not approve of.

All German Youth had to be part of Hitlerjugend or Bund Deutscher Maedel, where they were taught to spy on their families and neighbours, and to denounce them. This turning of children against their parents was eloquently described in Orwell’s 1984.

One must also remember that Hitler did not have a real popular mandate. The Nazis never won an electoral majority, nor could Hitler even win the presidency. The Nazis only got a majority in the Reichstag after the fire, when they banned the Communist Party, and abolished their 80-odd seats. They then moved forward with the Enabling Act, which led to the banning of the Social Democrats, Catholic center and all other political Parties except the NSDAP. 

There is absolutely nothing redeeming that can be said about the Nazi era. The only possible exception to this was his disapproval of interest based banking. 

Furthermore, Hitler made some incredibly stupid military mistakes.

One of his mistakes is that he refused to implement the use of assault rifles. German developers created the MBK42; and assault rifle that combined the best features of a military rifle and a sub machine gun. This was desperately needed in the kind of warfare Germany was instigating. it’s practical application on the battlefield was an astonishing success. During a political argument in Berlin, Hitler threw a hissy fit and scrapped the whole project.

Germany invented the worlds first jet powered aircraft; the ME-262 fighter jets. It’s speed maneuverability was a tremendous advantage over propeller airplanes. Hitler canceled production of the jets. 

Hitler instituted an impractical policy of no retreat. He thought that the triumph of the will would ensure success on the battlefield, even while his troops were being decimated on several fronts.

German army was unprepared for the problems presented by Russian winters. In June 1941 Hitler began the invasion of Russia. He made the fatal mistake of underestimating the needs of his army when winter came. Germany was stopped dead in its tracks, while Russia, long accustomed to the brutal winters of their country, took advantage of this. 

Hitler had no idea how to strategically use the V1 and V2 rockets Germany had developed. This and other brilliant innovations in military technology were, unfortunately for the nazis, placed in Hitler’s hands. He had no idea how to utilize the immense potential of the technology he had at his disposal. Instead of using them against the American and Russian soldiers massing against Germany’s borders, he decided to use them on civilian targets in London where they were often shot down before they could do any real damage.

Like Donald Trump, Hitler never took the advice and guidance of his generals. In the beginning he would listen to their advice, like when Field Marshall Runstead successfully orchestrated the invasion of France. Hitler‘s drug and syphilis induced paranoia,however, inspired him to consistently reject the advice of his generals, actually had useful ideas about how to conduct the war.

Handing control of the Luftwaffe to Goering was another of Hitler’s idiotic mistakes. Goering proved himself to be an utterly incompetent commander. 

Hitler failed to understand that one of the things the defeated Germany in World War I was the attempt to fight a two front war. He repeated this mistake, and doomed Germany to a humiliating defeat. Had Hitler pressed the attack on England under improved leadership, and trained the Lufwaffe to efficiently engage the RAF until England was no longer a problem, Germany’s position would have been improved. Then he could have concentrated on his primary goal of Russia.

Then he made another idiotic mistake by declaring war on the United States. When Japan attacked the United States in 1941, Hitler followed through on his agreements with Japan and declared war on the United States. This was a foolish move because on the one hand he had a reputation of reneging on his agreements, so it would not have hurt him much to refuse war with the United States. At the time the United States was a relatively weaker military power; but because of its geographic location allowing the concentration on industry and development, it improved its military with astonishing speed. Hitler should have seen this coming.

Hitler’s obsession with Stalingrad was also a major part of his undoing. The original objective of the Russian invasion was the Caucuses which had immense natural resources such as oil which would have been advantageous to Germany. Hitler‘s decision to divert a large part of his army in the attempt to capture Stalingrad was yet another example of Hitler grossly underestimating his enemies. For a time he had the opportunity to pull his men back and capture his original objective on the Causases; but foolishly stripped troops away from there to concentrate on Stalingrad. The Russians proved to be more resilient than he anticipated. This was an unbelievably stupid move because capturing the Caucuses and its resources was the original reason for his invasion of Russia.

All told, the idea of Hitler being a military genius is a ridiculous myth.

===================

Permit me to share an epiphany I had many years ago.

I noticed something people; regardless of race (and I must preface my statement by clarifying something. I say “so called” because I believe that the various categories of races defined only by skin color, white, black, brown, yellow, red, are so diverse that these broad strokes are an artificial social construct that exists only in the disordered imagination of people who place politics before reality). People are often largely motivated by fear. But it does not end there. Many cultures (note the plural) are taught to love and savor fear - which ultimately turns out to be fear of nothing that must attach itself to something to justify its own existence. Others sense this (even if they are unable to articulate it), and are either terrified by it, or use it to their advantage against their enemies. Either way, in this, psychological and spiritual diseases are exacerbated, and injuries are prevented from healing.

In the end, this will be the downfall of everybody. Nobody wins.

Nationalism, especially race based nationalism, is a manifestation of what Islam terms “Shirk” (roughly translated as polytheism). The real inner difference between monotheism and polytheism is that monotheism looks at multiplicity and sees unity, whereas a polytheist looks at unity and sees multiplicity. The later separates by making a false idol of their own image of themselves (nationalistic, racial, ethnic, fill in the blank) and simultaneously worships it and declares a holy war against all that does not resemble the imagery they worship.

But it goes even deeper than that. They're condemning themselves to a psycho-spiritual cul-de-sac from which they may never escape; all to sustain a psycho-social structure based only on free floating fear. Remember what I said about fear? All else, the race consciousness, the nationalism, the religious rhetoric contaminated by politics, etc. is nothing more than an external mask behind which this fear hides, terrified of exposure.

They think they are safe behind a fortress of self created power. But they're not safe, and will NEVER find safety in the world they've immersed themselves in. It does not matter what religion or political ideology they claim to follow. There is, in the end, no escaping this. The only thing that will ever unite these people is mutual hate – the exact same thing that will condemn them to extinction and ruin.

You will know them by the hypocrisy that inevitably oozes out of the cracks in their façade. Their speech will amaze you and sound appealing, eloquent, and seductive; they do nothing but lie.

And even if they accurately describe the problems of the world, they have no solutions. All they will ever be able to do is replace one system of tyranny and senseless slaughter with another identical to the one they overthrew in all but external appearance, all the while claiming “we are bringing peace.”

They can argue against this until their noses bleed. They can kill and maim to try to prove how committed to peace they are. The fact remains that what I said is true, and in their heart of hearts they know it.

The only people who can possibly be offended by what I said are those who recognize themselves in my words.

The recent rise of white supremacy / neo national socialism was the result of a subliminal cultivation of the psycho-spiritual disease that was in this continent for centuries. But it was stimulated in a way that has no historical precedent.

It began as an underground cyber-campaign. Young white supremacists understood that their old way of doing things (shaved heads, jackboots, swastika tattoos, noisy music, etc.) took them as far as they could take it. They changed their tactics: they made white supremacy friendly, approachable, and non-threatening to white people. This allowed them to add momentum to their fear of the Obama administration, to profit from the corruption of the democratic party, and present what seemed on the surface a viable alternative to the two-party system. It also allowed them to provide an identity to people of European descent who, owing to lack of imagination and insight, couldn't find it on their own without stepping on the ethnic identity of others.

Furthermore, it allowed them to spread one of the most addictive drugs in human history: the intoxication of political power. In light if this, the racist roots of their movement become a catalyst for something even more dark and evil.

Their main weapon was what they describe in their underground publications as "weaponized autism." You will know this as "meme warfare." They do what Hitler did: reduce their demented philosophies to four or five simple points which they repeat over and over - and translate them to visual stimuli in the form of memes they make viral. 

The effect is subliminal, and most of their less intelligent followers accept this with no idea of where they actually saw these messages. 

This was a brilliant move; they turned the internet, human gullibility, stupidity, intellectual laziness, and the "dumbing down of America" into their personal delivery system for their ideological weapons.

There is another dimension to white supremacy / national socialism that is rooted in esoteric symbolism and occult practices. But that's a discussion for another day.

The anti-Jewish position white supremacists have draws on over 1000 years of anti-Jewish conspiracy theories among white Christians. To the white supremacist, Jewish assimilation into whiteness is a plot to dilute whiteness from within. This has been expressed in the Great Replacement theory, which is the direct motivation for their terrorist acts. They believe Jews are systematically promoting immigration with the ultimate goal of creating mixed race super citizens. These super citizens would be more malleable for the Jewish purpose of world control. White supremacists believe they are the only people on earth with the courage and clarity of mind to stand up against this.

In the mind of the white supremacist, a Jew can be anything (i.e., a cultural Marxist who is poisoning your children with race theory in the Bolshevik ideas that all races are equal. Capitalists who are keeping everybody poor and miserable, etc.).  

Christianity in the United States has long been entangled with white supremacy. Our original sin of anti-black racism (which actually had its origins in economic and industrial expediency) used the Bible as a justification. Centuries later, nothing has changed. 

It’s important to note that among white supremacists there are neo-pagans who wish to revive the old Nordic and Teutonic mythologies. But there is something that they need to take into careful consideration.

In “The Entry of the Gods into Valhalla, the final scene of Richard Wagner’s opera Das Rheingold, the same gods the aforementioned white supremacist faction venerate, have rejected mankind as weak, cruel, and greedy. For this reason, they are leaving the earth forever and entering Valhalla. But every step toward their perfect home is filled with tragedy. The gods are doomed; fated to die in a cataclysmic fire.

This proves they are false gods and their power is an illusion. They are just as venal and corrupt as the humans they have rejected.

White supremacists do not understand this. This will be instrumental in their undoing, and they won’t see this until it is too late to turn back.

Right Wing fascism is very often the result of a failed left-wing revolution. More specifically, the inevitable ruin of right-wing fascism is the result of a left-wing government failure to provide its people with what they truly need. 

This is because left-wing governments cannot recapture the energy that put them in power in the first place. As a result, it’s impossible for them to offer a new political model that would inspire and mobilize its people, nor provide the consistency to sustain itself.

To complicate matters, a majority of the left and right cannot accept the fact that the 20th century has ended. With the left, communism, its most extreme expression, has proven itself to be a failure. One of the greatest ironies in history is that ex-communists are the most efficient agents of the most ruthless liberal global capitalism. 

Socialist democracy has run its course. It cannot find an environment to operate in the modern world. In order to survive it would have to be radically reinvented, and to the best of my knowledge nobody has done that. Another irony is that wherever social democracy actually exists it has turned out to be a great force of conservatism.

Our lives have been changed radically through digitization, new forms of science, and new forms of liberal capitalism. 

Some embrace rejection of political parties and state power in favor of local democracies and transparent local communities managing public affairs. But this can only work if we simultaneously embrace the idea that our problems are global problems in a very radical sense. 

Likewise, the old models of capitalism which many people cling to cannot function in a world that must factor the unprecedented technological advances that are all around us.  in a strange way it resembles the most traditional forms of Marxism. Specifically, with the development of productive forces, a new situation emerges where old production methods become obsolete. 

Ultimately capitalism has reached its limit. And with it both left-wing and right-wing ideologies have become unworkable and inapplicable to our modern world. Neither side has any way of addressing the problems of issues such as ecological damage and restoration, the protection of intellectual property, the ethical questions presented to us through advances in biogenetics, the loss of privacy and individual freedom and identity through digitization, artificial intelligence, space exploration and the industries and political problems that will arise from this, etc. 

Who can control this in a way that keeps social order intact and is beneficial to all of humanity? The existing models of political leadership cannot meet these challenges. If they attempt to do so they will create failure after failure and by necessity resort to totalitarianism to prevent inevitable systemic collapse.

We are approaching a critical moment. The left should thrive in such moments, but because they have no solutions, they are collapsing. Their collapse would create a vacuum that would be filled by right wing fascism which would be equally disastrous.

There is a noticeable weakness among all revolutionaries. They never give a moment’s thought to what happens after the revolution. Never. How would they re-organize and restructure the power of their society? They never have a clue. Winning their revolution inevitably plants the seed of the exact same totalitarianism they fought to remove. This is done to “safeguard” the revolution, and only guarantees that they become the exact thing they fear and hate.

The ultimate cause of populism is the simple fact that we live in an era of great dissatisfaction and rage. But the left doesn’t have a model to deal with this. All that has are empty slogans, the will to totalitarian aristocracy, and the erroneous belief that liberal democratic capitalism is the ultimate form of political and economic power. The right doesn’t have a solution either. All it has is a similar plethora of empty slogans, directing that rage and dissatisfaction outward (as opposed to the left directing it inward), and the will to historical retrogression into an era that never existed. 

Nearly every element of these belief systems promises their inevitable ruin. I urge them to abandon their demented ideology and psychotic leadership, all of which is driving them to extinction and damnation and turn back while there's still time.

(PS: yes, racists, I just dissected you as if you were laboratory rats and exposed your inner dementia to the world. My assessment is true, and you are powerless to defend your position with anything but lies or violent outbursts, which only prove my assessment to be correct.)