Pride Cometh Before the Fall

The pride movement and the subsequent establishment of pride month started as a call for people to mind their business and love who they want to love.

Before I continue, permit me to offer a caveat. It’s inevitable that someone will read this and call me a “hater.” Such generic labels and knee-jerk reactions show an astonishing lack of imagination.

For the moment, let’s leave alone the prohibitions against homosexuality found in the Revelations and Scriptures of Islam, (which, for the record, I’m in complete agreement with. I will not comment on the prohibitions against homosexuality found in Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, or Buddhism, and will let those communities speak for themselves). While the idea of having sex with a man makes my skin crawl, as does the spectacle itself, I actually care very little for what consenting adults do behind closed doors. It’s none of my concern and don’t want to know anything about it. I do not have a monkey in that circus. 

And to be even more candid, there are people of the LGBTQ persuasion whose accomplishments I admire. A noteworthy few; Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Arthur C. Clarke, Freddie Mercury, James Baldwin, and Meschell Ndegeocello. The important distinction to be made here is that I admire them for their accomplishments - not for the fact of their sexuality. Their orientation is not relevant to their talents and contributions, and can never be considered a factor.

A point of contention that is almost always brought up is the claim that people are “born gay.” This claim has its roots in the work of neuroscientist and gay activist Simon LeVey.

In 1991, LeVay published an article that compared a structure in the hypothalamus called INAH3 in the brains of male homosexuals to that found in a group of heterosexual men and heterosexual women. On average, LeVay found that the INAH3 in the brains of heterosexual men were more than twice as large as that found in the homosexuals. On the surface, this suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.

However, his claims met with criticism from the scientific community. LeVay's study only considered 41 brain samples, which produces too few data points, and can make study results unreliable. In heterosexual males, LeVay found that the INAH3 structure was about the size of a grain of sand. In women (and in gay men), it was almost non-existent. The extremely small size of these structures make it difficult to precisely measure in tissue slices. LeVay's data showed a large range of size values for INAH3 in both the homosexual and heterosexual brains. There was also too much overlap in the data: some of the homosexual men had larger INAH3 structures, some of the heterosexual men had smaller structures. Finally, LeVay’s study ignored environment influences on human brain structures. There was not enough information about the people in the study to know whether the results were biological in nature, or whether the behavior of the homosexual participants caused that region of the brain to change over time.

To be fair, LeVay cautioned against misinterpreting his findings: "I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain."

It may be pointed out that LeVay had a personal agenda for his research. LeVay took a leave of absence from his academic career to take care of his lover Richard Hersey, who had contracted AIDS. After Hersey died in 1990, LeVay decided to concentrate his research on the physiological aspects of homosexuality. LeVay was quoted in Discover Magazine as saying "I had an emotional need to do something more personal, something connected with my gay identity."

LeVay’s research provided the LGBTQ community with the political ammunition to propagate the idea that their sexual orientation is genetically predisposed. This relieves them of the responsibility for their lifestyles, and indoctrinates feelings of sympathy and forbearance among non-LGBTQ.  

But it has become a bigger problem. The LGBTQ community claims to be deeply marginalized, and have banded together to form a political resistance. It is no mystery how and why it happened; any marginalized and persecuted group of people will, inevitably, seek a position of power and unassailability. This is human nature and cannot be changed.

The movement claimed (and probably believed) that they simply wished to end the persecution against them. They succeeded in establishing an entire month dedicated to celebrating and promoting their sexual proclivities.

This has reached extreme proportions and turned into a crusade to force people, regardless of their religious or political beliefs, to accept a way of life they do not want. The social convention that the LGBTQ community created demands that they are celebrated for no reason other than their sexual identity. They appear to want to be worshipped as idols for no reason other than their sexual orientation. To make matters worse, they respond to the slightest criticism or statement that contradicts their agenda with emotional and sometimes political violence.

Men who dress up as and “identify” as women - or submit to sexual reassignment surgery- demand the privilege to victimize women in sports, public restrooms, locker rooms, etc. and respond to the refusal of their demands with the threat of violence.

Governments and corporations are forced to - or voluntarily - pander to the LGBTQ community. Pride flags are on display everywhere, including schools, businesses, government buildings, and embassies. There is no difference between the way they promote themselves than from the way the nazis in Germany or the communists in Russia and China promoted themselves in the beginning of their existence. They use the same methods without distinction.

People are “cancelled” for no reason other than that they refuse to submit to the intellectual gymnastics required to apply confusing and meaningless pronouns to describe genders that do not exist anywhere except in people’s disordered imaginations.

One of the most horrible and unacceptable aspects of this is that they are targeting children.

All age drag shows force us against our will to applaud the spectacle of bearded men attired like cheap prostitutes augmented with BDSM gear, and more makeup than Joan Crawford and the members of a Scandinavian death metal band combined grind their private parts into the faces of children. 

The trans community are pushing children into transition. Preteens are indoctrinated on the idea of sexual reassignment. And when those who go through with it experience adverse and traumatic physiological and psychological side effects (really, what did they expect would happen?) their voices are stifled. 

LGBTQ agenda has specifically targeted children who are too young to understand sexuality or the responsibility of choices as a demographic. This ranges from children’s books that are sold in book stores and practically mandated to be included in scholastic curriculum, to outright pedophile groomers, such as Jeffery Marsh.

Recently, a Federal judge in Arkansas struck down Arkansas’ ban on “gender-affirming care” for minors. 18 states have passed similar laws. To make the situation more horrifying, White House Spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre was quoted as saying “These are our kids. They belong to all of us.” This is a direct implication that the US government is the final authority over how children are raised, and even insinuating that children are the property of the government. And they are aggressively pushing the LGBTQ agenda as a political and social structure.

The beginning of the process involves a course of drugs; puberty blockers and hormone therapy. No studies on the long-term effects of these drugs have been done. It is fairly safe to say that infertility is a common side-effect, as is osteoporosis, early onset cancer, and chemical castration.

But this is the beginning precursor to “gender-affirming bottom surgery.” The process to surgically transform a woman into a man starts with a double mastectomy. This is followed by flaying the patient’s leg or arm to the veins, leaving an irreversible scar. This is done to produce something approximating a penis. Most of the time, the skin graft will not take. If it does, the result will neither resemble nor function like a penis. For males, this involves their penis being cut in half, flayed and partially inverted into their body. This attempt at creating a vagina will cause complications for life. Owing to the presence of male DNA (which cannot be eradicated), the wound will continually attempt to heal itself. Urination will almost never be straightforward, and infections will be inevitable. Anyone who submits to “gender-affirming surgery” will be in and out of hospitals for the rest of their life.

And this is being promoted to children, with the backing of a socio-political and economic power base. In some places, there is no law against doctors giving children below the age of consent and responsibility these puberty blockers and hormone treatment drugs without the consent and knowledge of the parents. There are even parents who promote this to their own children: a web search will produce sufficient evidence to support this. President Joe Biden has called any efforts to stop this “outrageous and immoral.”

There is a truth about transexuals that cannot be denied. Someone who is born male or female who attempts to embody the qualities of the opposite gender will inevitably fail. All of the surgeries and hormone injections in the world combined with tons of makeup, weird clothes that don’t fit right, meaningless pronouns, and affectation cannot circumvent this. There is no escape what they really are. They believe their femininity quotient will increase in direct proportion to the loss of masculinity (or vice verse), and it simply doesn’t work. Such people will never be able to manifest the identity they are attempting to appropriate, and they will never be free of the identity they are trying to escape. Even their personalities are contrived, unearthly, and utterly bizarre. Nothing about them is authentic. There is no way they can disguise the self-hatred that inspired their acts of self mutilation. In the end, a trans person of whatever variety will manifest as pitiful, bizarre, and the antithesis of what they are trying to be. The best they can hope for is some kind of limbo of the worst of both worlds. And they can never escape the fact that, by choice and consent, nobody can respect or take them seriously, and that they have no real place anywhere in the world.

There is no arguing against the fact that the LGBTQ community are no longer oppressed. They are the oppressors. What they call “love” and claim is natural and beautiful are propagated and backed up with methods used in every existing system of totalitarianism. In doing so, they are intoxicated by power and the thrill of dominating a defeated enemy. In the end, these denizens of the rainbow mafia prove their hearts to be full of viscous intentions they dress up with fantasies and lies.

And they are forcing themselves upon innocent children in an effort to propagate and empower their demented beliefs and practices. If a child is having gender identity problems, they should be given counseling, psychological therapy, mentorship. Help them understand what they’re struggling with. The idea of polluting their body chemistry with dangerous drugs and butchering them with surgery on the level of something Josef Mengele would have done is beyond unacceptable.

The LGBTQ are the very thing they claim to hate. This will only get worse. They will not stop until they have absolute power of everyone.

The religious prohibitions against homosexuality have proven themselves to be accurate. Their behavior is identical to how they are described in Qur’anic Revelations. It’s almost as if they were reading from a script. They are doomed to the same humiliating fate all such people meet. They will have no one but themselves to blame.