The pantheon of gods of ancient religions (and despite being a sci-fi fan, I would dare include the modern mythologies such as Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Star Trek, The Dune Chronicles, the Matrix trilogy, etc. are, in their original form, nothing more than
1. Psychological archetype,
2. Descriptions of natural process,
3. Historical record via poetic metaphor, or
4. Mathematical allegory.
Their worship is an act of futility. The aggregate of their essence could not equal the inner essence and potential human beings have been created with - and are almost completely blind to.
Allah is best to know.
That said, it is clear that despite the strong impression they may make upon human perception, they have limits and are finite. They are components of a greater whole and rely upon a symbiotic interrelation to form and sustain this whole. Of themselves, their existence (whatever form that takes in reality) cannot be sustained by their own power, effort, or will for a nanosecond. Beyond this, an underlying Absolute Oneness designed, defined and sustains their existence.
In the end, they are powerless and impotent.
One of the main differences between polytheists and monotheists is that polytheists perceive multiplicity in unity, whereas monotheists perceive unity in multiplicity.
The 99 names of Allah are attributes of the same Being, and their qualities are defined by their action and effect upon created being. To call ar-Rahman or ar-Rahim a "mother goddess" is to identify these attributes as separate entities with an individual "self," individual will, and beings definable by specific and limited qualities. This would lead to the idolatry of worshiping the "self" defined by these qualities. The logic of this position demands it and makes it inevitable.
However, “Being” can only be applied to Allah (in the same sense that the Arabic word "ahad" is only applicable to Allah because it means an absolute of uniqueness and oneness, as opposed to "wahid," which means on out of a category of similar or identical things or beings. The Being of Allah is both emptiness and abundance as all beings are known and experienced, or unknown and yet to be experienced. The being of a "god" or "goddess" is distinct and identifiable; whereas Being is indefinable or can only be defined by what Hu is not (hence the kalima begins with a negation: "La" - no god but Allah). The uniqueness and singularity of Being cannot be attained by any being. A being may be powerful, outstanding, etc.; but there is always another like it. The Being of Allah has no counterpart and is simultaneously formless and the author of all form.
Being reveals itself to our perception in an endless variety of oppositions that cannot be coincidental, and eventually show themselves to be interconnected in a symbiotic interrelated network. The being of Allah is absolutely void and absolutely abundant, the most obvious and at the same time most resistant to conceptualizing.
There has never been, nor could ever be, a god or goddess that can claim these qualities (although Allah has been known by other names: the Tao, Adonai, "I Am that I Am," etc.). The conclusion of Tawhid is inevitable, unless one resists that inevitable momentum, to their ultimate ruin.
Pity the kings of separation who make no just estimate of Allah.
All things point to Tawhid.