An Uncomfortable Interpretation of Church History
The Analects of Dawoud Kringle part 4
In the early centuries of Christian civilization, the Roman Empire found it politically expedient to assimilate Pauline Trinitarian Christianity into Roman paganism. It founded a government based on a theological model which bears little resemblance to the authentic teachings of Jesus (as).
During the Middle Ages, Christian civilization found itself at odds with both Islamic civilization and pagan civilization. It eventually flourished but instilled within itself a plethora of doctrines that contradict logic and reality. Like communism and fascism, it became necessary to establish a totalitarian rule in an attempt to protect this unsustainable model.
It started to collapse during the Enlightenment. This was an attempt to correct the corruption, tyranny, and bizarre doctrines of the Church. It erred, however, in failing to develop an adequate explanation for Divinity that did not contradict science. Ironically, it ignored Islam, and the answers to their dichotomy that are found in Tawhid.
This became the birth of atheist / agnostic civilization. It’s method of compensating for its spiritual contradictions was twofold: 1. Develop a system of usury-based economics in order to use nonexistent money and perpetual debt to consolidate wealth in the hands of an elite, and 2. Use political philosophy and pseudoscience to make reality as malleable as the Church did with its metaphysical doctrines.
Inevitably, the theories of race and nationalism needed to be put into practice to support the endless economic expansion inherent in usurious economics. None of these theories has any real basis in fact and went so far against what Islam terms “Fitra” that it could only perpetuate itself by developing ideas more destructive and demented than previously held.
The ironic thing is that racism and nationalism effectively destroys the very qualities its practitioners think it protects. The evidence of this is so obvious it scarcely bears mentioning.
We are left with entire populations of automations who are perpetuating a metaphilosophy it neither understands nor has the intelligence, imagination, conceptual framework, and courage of convictions to rectify.